Originos

Please click in to the following recently-updated essayettes elaborating on various aspects of evolutionism verses creationism:

Evolutionists do NOT WANT to accept THE ONE Biblical Answer!

There are two kinds of assertions, and they are either presumptions, or assumptions.

If you (the reader of what you are now reading), and yours truly (the writer of what you are now reading), want to seriously think, be sufficiently frank and forthright, and respectably honest enough, we can and should both concur that the environmental phenomena around us exists - both pertaining to physical objects and to forces of nature we have detected and yet detect with our sight, hearing, smell, and touch senses.

Such admission by the two of us is fortunate, because if either or both of us doubt, dispute, or disagree with the above premises, neither one or both of us would be worth talking to, but instead reprehensible and even dangerous weirdos worth having law enforcement officers and their assistants take charge concerning (and not regarding) us.

Note that I used the questionable word: "us".

I -- and you also -- must be careful to NOT speak for each other unless justified in doing so, and so also the word: "we" has to be used only when applicable and appropriate!

In other words, what is real is therefore (logically) NOT an illusion. And even if we assessed some phenomena around us to be illusions, it would behoove both of us to wisely discern which from what, and both act and behave accordingly.

Take, for example, the existence of both red and green stoplights at intersections - both of which environmental phenomena are directly related to the environmental phenomena of potentially-red-and-blue-strobelight-flashing squad cars perhaps in the near vicinity more than eager to relate to how you and/or I react to the two different-colored stoplights.

Now, either or both of us might presume that red and green stoplights are illusions, and/or that green means stop and red means go, but there is a realistic extremely-high-probability chance that those police officers previously alluded to might think otherwise.

In their case, they - quite ready and able to arrest and ticket violators who wrongly (?) react to the different-colored stoplights (in their "opinion") - assume that the lights are indeed reality and not illusion (and literally mean EXACTLY what they are supposed to mean regardless of "interpretive differences" or "contextual disagreements" - be they "constitutional" or not issues of either "freedom of [nefarious] speech" or "freedom of [coexisting] religion" or "reproductive choice" purportedly integrated with "women's health."

Because of that, we are fearful to contradict their take on it, and adjust our driving behavior with accommodation to their assessment.

Having established all that so far, that things around us DO exist and are not instead a lying illusion, and that we adjust our actions and behavior accordingly in the assumption that such is fact instead of myth, fairy tale, legend, tale, rumor, or heresay, we perhaps then continue into metaphysical speculations about the origin of all around us which does exist.

It is a noteworthy characteristic of the sane (contrasted with crazy or lunatic) to assume that real and non-illusional phenomena of nature around us (including those phenomena of nature humanity has manipulated for the construction and maintenance of buildings, walls, floors, ceilings, heaters, air conditioners, carpets, glass windows, light bulbs or equivalent, etc.) did not create themselves by themselves, particularly non-lifeform objects and forces (many of which - like the Creator(s)? thereof - are invisible to the non-aided human eye, such as wind, gravity, infrared and ultraviolet and microwave and X-ray radiation).

Even regarding lifeforms which reproduce, it is entirely reasonable to assume that the starters or first ones in existence did not create themselves by themselves.

Show me a paper dictionary that assembles itself out of forestwood, or a car with all its parts assembling itself (preferably off the assembly line) out of iron ore rocks buried underground, and I will consider giving you a popsicle. But only one. Per day. For a week. Or a month. Maybe.

Again, at this point, we have to repeat what was stated before, and more.

Such admission by the two of us about non-virtual reality is fortunate, because if either or both of us doubt, dispute, or disagree with the above premises, neither one or both of us would be worth talking to, but instead pathetic and even dangerous weirdos worth having law enforcement officers and their assistants take charge concerning (and not regarding) us.

The Origin of all things, at least in their initial manifestation, must - of necessity - be related to some Superior Force, or Thing, or Group of Things, or Lifeform (rather than person-less Inanimate Object, shall we assume?) . . . or - as one fascinating and intriguing Phenomenon of Reality (i.e. Holy Writ) puts it in variously-translated alphabet characters within its printed pages: God.

Please do not be shocked, dismayed, or even mildly taken back by this author mentioning the "religious" word: "God" associated with the concept of Creator.

You, the reader, are both strongly admonished and urgently implored to not now go off on some senseless rampage or hatefully-vicious binge or vendetta or crusade with a wildly-capricious conglomeration of slander and ridicule. Such does no good in continuing open-minded and non-fettered communication as to thinking about the origin of phenomena around us, and certainly does not negate the existence of the word: "God" within that environmental phenomenon known as: "The Bible" - nor does one's mindless and myopic disdain or scurrilous potty-mouthing negate anything in The Bible itself.

Dealer's Choice is choosing to not consider contents of the inferior-content Qur'an, Book of Mormon, Apocrypha, and a plethora of lesser litteration.

What (or better yet, Who) "God" is, relating to the thought and concept of 'Creator,' is comprehensively-enough and sufficiently elaborated upon within The HOLY Bible - a Bible penned by humanity themselves, comprised of beyond-mere-conjecture illumination and enlightenment and information which mere human mortals are not capable of concocting by themselves without Divine inspiration.

Don't get me wrong. Lying and dishonest fairy tales, legends, myths, allegories and metaphors, symbolism, and such can be facetiously made up by those who for some cause not only crave causing doubt and disbelief but relish and "get their kicks" and "jollies" imposing not simply silly and stupid, but downright dangerous and even lethal, misinformation.

What is contained within the contents of The Bible - in stark and refreshing and thankful contrast - is not simply the best description of environmental reality which currently exists, but gives humans an awareness, recognition, and fantastic overview of beyond-mere-physical "spiritual" phenomena not limited by the five human senses (and in addition, according to Biblical Scriptures, overriding mere physical phenomena and the limited parameters of such).

All the malicious doubt and denial in the entire world by impious revilers - by all those so given in to besieging and persecuting those of an entirely different mindset - has not and does not and will not negate the existent reality of either The Bible or the contents therein . . . though hollow and ineffectual sordid claims to the contrary have been, are, and will be made.

To quote from "the Forbidden Book" (i.e. part of the Sacred-66-books, Judeo/Christian, Old-and-New-Testament, Holy Bible) [ and "Excuse Me, for so doing" ]:

First Corinthians 1:18 For the word of the cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God.
19 For it is written, "I will destroy the wisdom of the wise, and the cleverness of the clever I will thwart."
20 Where is the wise man? Where is the scribe? Where is the debater of this age? Has not God made foolish the wisdom of the world?
21 For since, in the wisdom of God, the world did not know God through wisdom, it pleased God through the "foolishness" of what we preach to save those who believe.
22 For Jews demand signs and Greeks seek wisdom,
23 but we preach Christ crucified, a stumbling block to Jews and folly to Gentiles,
24 but to those who are called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God.
25 For the foolishness of God is wiser than humans, and the weakness of God is stronger than humans.
26 For consider your call, brethren; not many of you were wise according to worldly standards, not many were powerful, not many were of noble birth;
27 but God chose what is foolish in the world to shame the wise, God chose what is weak in the world to shame the strong,
28 God chose what is low and despised in the world, even things that are not, to bring to nothing things that are,
29 so that no human being might boast in the presence of God.
30 He is the source of your life in Christ Jesus, whom God made our wisdom, our righteousness and sanctification and redemption;
31 therefore, as it is written, "Let him who boasts, boast of the Lord."

First Corinthians 2:1 When I came to you, brethren, I did not come proclaiming to you the testimony of God in lofty words or wisdom.
2 For I decided to know nothing among you except Jesus Christ and Him crucified.
3 And I was with you in weakness and in much fear and trembling;
4 and my speech and my message were not in plausible words of wisdom, but in demonstration of the Spirit and of power,
5 that your faith might not rest in the wisdom of men but in the power of God.
6 Yet among the mature we do impart wisdom, although it is not a wisdom of this age or of the rulers of this age, who are doomed to pass away.
7 But we impart a secret and hidden wisdom of God, which God decreed before the ages for our glorification.
8 None of the rulers of this age understood this; for if they had, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory.
9 But, as it is written, "What no eye has seen, nor ear heard, nor the heart of man conceived, what God has prepared for those who love him,"
10 God has revealed to us through the Spirit. For the Spirit searches everything, even the depths of God.
11 For what person knows a man's thoughts except the spirit of the man which is in him? So also no one comprehends the thoughts of God except the Spirit of God.
12 Now we have received not the spirit of the world, but the Spirit which is from God, that we might understand the gifts bestowed on us by God.
13 And we impart this in words not taught by human wisdom but taught by the Spirit, interpreting spiritual truths to those who possess the Spirit.
14 The non-spiritual [man] does not receive the gifts of the Spirit of God, for they are foolishness to [him], and [he] is not able to understand them because they are spiritually discerned.
15 The spiritual [man] judges all things, but is [himself] to be judged by no one.
16 "For who has known the mind of the Lord so as to instruct him?" But we have the mind of Christ.

Part of that "mature" mentioned in verse 6 above relates to a healthy aversion against women in government, even though there was the silly-fluke case of Big Judge Deborah and Wimpy Barak in the Old Testament, and the vague meaning of the word "chief" in the New Testament:

Acts 17:4 And some of them believed and joined themselves to Paul and Silas, both a great group of the worshiping Greeks, and not a few of the "chief" (whatever that means) women.

But the majority jist of Scripture strongly indicates that women are not "chief" among adult males, and should not be called "sir" if in uniform (as, for example, an all-women-only Navy WAVE or Army WAC):

Ecclesiastes 7:28 ...One man among a thousand I found, but a woman among all these I have not found.

Isaiah 3:12 My people: children are their oppressors, and women rule over them. Oh my people, your leaders mislead you, and confuse the course of your paths.

Nahum 3:12 All your fortresses are like fig trees with first-ripe figs--if shaken they fall into the mouth of the eater.
Nahum 3:13 Hey, your troops are women within you. The gates of your land are wide open to your foes; fire has devoured your barricades.

First Timothy 2:11 Let a woman learn in silence with all subjection.
12 I allow no woman to teach or to have authority over men; she is to keep silent.
13 For Adam was formed first, then Eve;
14 and Adam was not deceived, but the woman was deceived and became a transgressor.
15 Yet woman will be saved through bearing children, if she continues in faith and love and holiness, with propriety.

Relating to 'Adam and Eve' in verses 13 and 14 above, the mixed-gender couple was called man and wife right from the start in Genesis and thus legitimately and "legally" married without State-issued marriage-license certification (as it was in the United States during the 1700s and 1800s) by an IRS-501(c)(3)-non-profit-"officialized" reverend ordained from an IRS-501(c)(3)-non-profit-"officialized" seminary with all the heavy-handed IRS-mischief "equal-rights"-for-women-feminists-and-homopervert-sexual-orientation baggage associated with that.

Obviously outside the limited scope of "in and for church" only, Adam and Eve were not merely the first familial unity, but also the first government unit - proven by the fact that they themselves contrived sin-instigated skimpy clothes by their own restriction (Gen. 3:7), soon enhanced by God's choice of long-hair-bound/long-sleeved-and-long-robed/moccasins-wearing wardrobe for them (Gen. 3:21) -- mandatory (for the sake of decency devoid of becoming and being public nuisances exhibiting disorderly conduct ... see First Timothy 2:8-9) because other reproduced husband/wife governmental units came on the scene who also were required to be clothed in general public view for the sake of sane-survival general public modesty. Such is not only commonly characteristic of civilized indigenous human tribes, but also respectable neighborhood city councils, county and state assemblies, state and federal house and senate, and so forth.

So here we come to the "what if . . ."

Being that it has been said in Scripture that Satan used such: "what if . . ." contrariness in the Garden of Eden against The Original Mother of Us All (i.e. Great-Gramma+ Eve), let's use it positively for good.

What if the Earth is not "four billion years old?"

Have I now committed The Unpardonable Mortal Sin by that simple non-religious suggestion?

Where and How did fake "scientists" anti-scientifically and non-scientifically come up with that millions/billions-years-old fiction?

How come the tall mountains have not been worn away to global flatness by gradual-but-supposedly-long-term erosion during that immense time period?

Are quack "scholars" erroneously basing the "four billion years" on presumptions about radioactive dating of isotopes, miscalculating how much of the original or parent material there was to start with, while ignoring and not taking into consideration addition of identical isotopes mixing in during Noah's Worldwide Catastrophic Flood?

Does God, according to His Divinely-inspired-Word Holy Bible, accept or promote so-called "gay" "rights?"

Does the LORD deem homosexual orientation "right" or instead "wrong?"

Does the Almighty Judge consider homogays (i.e. homoeffeminate and/or homosodomites) "equal with heterosexuals?"

Did the Creator, who destroyed all lifeforms (except Noah plus his immediate family and select Ark-transported lifeforms) on planet Earth with a global Flood, mean for the colors of the rainbow seen thereafter by Noah and Company to be interpreted as a promotion of homosexuality?

Let's find out by quoting some of His humanly-authored Scripture, some of which was verbally dictated to Moses according to:

Numbers 7:89 And when Moses went into the tent of meeting to speak with the Lord, he heard The Voice speaking to him from above the mercy seat that was upon the ark of the testimony, from between the two cherubim; and It spoke to him.

Leviticus 20:13 If a man lies with a male as with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination; they shall be put to death, their blood is upon them.

Romans 1:24 Therefore God gave them up in the lusts of their hearts to impurity, to the dishonoring of their bodies among themselves,
25 because they exchanged the truth about God for a lie and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed for ever! Amen.
26 For this cause God gave them up to dishonorable passions. Their women exchanged natural relations for unnatural,
27 and the men likewise gave up natural relations with women and were consumed with passion for one another, men committing shameless acts with men and receiving in their own persons the due penalty for their error.

First Corinthians 6:9 Do you not know that the non-righteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived; neither the immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate (i.e. homogays), nor [same-gender] sodomites,
First Corinthians 6:10 nor thieves, nor the greedy, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor robbers will inherit the kingdom of God.

Why are sea-creature fossils found at the tops of the mountains? Can stalactites and stalagmites form by calcification in a VERY short time, as have diamonds from compressed carbon in an equally short time?

Could not probably-constant-speed enroute starlight from "millions-of-light-years-distant" stars and galaxies and nebula which have been and yet are visible to human observers on Earth during the several thousand years of human history have been created along with the stars and galaxies and nebula such supposedly are related to?

What if hallucinating pseudo-"scientists" and biased/bigoted-against-Genesis deceivers concocted that "4-billion" figure out of the blue -- using erroneous-source starting-point-and-time presumptions, exacerbating the falsity with presumptive never-never-land processes which never happened?

What if "God" (the Creator) DID create everything as historically recorded in Genesis?

The atheist and agnostic retort: "We simply do not know."

WHY should they be content with "not knowing," when there is at least ONE answer (what is contained within The Bible)?

Are they that way with other things in their lives? Do they want to know and find out if McDonald's still exists and is open for business when they are hungry? Do they not want to discover if their car will start to get them to McDonald's when they turn the ignition key? Do they not want to see if their BIOS passcode will get them into their computer after they have inserted fast food and drink into the big holes under their noses and gorged their arrogant bellies at McDonalds, or Arby's, Wendy's, Hardees, KFC, or Burger King?

Do they take pseudo-sophisticated pride in bragging to everyone that they "do not know?"

Or are they being hypocritical dastardly liars, claiming that they have no answer, when they damn well already know even the intricate details of Scripture's Genesis chapter one . . . but for some vile and filthy God-forsaken irrationalization have refused to accept that answer?

To (surprise surprise!) quote from the Bible once more ["Oh NO! Here he goes again!"]:

Second Corinthians 11:12 And what I do I will continue to do, in order to undermine the claim of those who would like to claim that in their boasted mission they work on the same terms as we do.
13 For such men are false apostles, deceitful workmen, disguising themselves as apostles of Christ.
14 And no wonder, for even Satan disguises himself as an angel of light.
15 So it is not strange if his servants also disguise themselves as servants of righteousness. Their end will correspond to their deeds.
16 I repeat, let no one think me foolish; but even if you do, accept me as a fool, so that I too may boast a little.
17 (What I am saying I say not with the Lord's authority but as a "fool," in this boastful confidence; [ and - shazam! - this "foolish" "non-authoritative" blurbing which follows is going to make it into canonical Scripture by Holy-Spirit enforcement ]
18 since many boast of worldly things, I too will boast.)
19 For you gladly bear with fools, being "wise" yourselves! [ and are you smart enough to sense my biting sarcasm? ]
20 For you bear it if a man makes slaves of you, or preys upon you, or takes advantage of you, or puts on airs, or strikes you in the face.
21 To my shame, I must say, we were too weak for that! [ and are you smart enough to sense my biting sarcasm? ] But whatever any one dares to boast of - I am speaking as a "fool" - I also dare to boast of that.
22 Are they Hebrews? So am I. Are they Israelites? So am I. Are they descendants of Abraham? So am I. [ and it gets even better, as I really hit you with a lot more! ]

Are they suspicious or jealous against Christian believers who suggest to such prideful no-nothings that what is contained in Genesis of The Bible at least could be true and factual and valid?

Do close-minded atheists and agnostics (having no ready-for-actual-observation and honestly-documented proof of real-time evolution or even fossil-record evolution) dogmatically (thus hypocritically) despise those allegedly-"dogmatic" Christian creationists who in fact perfectly tie in the exact semantics of The Bible for what is in fact actually found in nature and their environment around them?

It is vital for lying doubters and scurrilous slanderers to not put words into the mouths of creationists which creationists never actually said, but merely indicated might be a possibility (even though a supposedly absurd one).

I remember one spiteful anti-creationist/anti-Bible doubter, trembling at times with somewhat-controlled demonically-sassy antagonism, say to me that I believed that pink elephants would come out of his rectum (although the term he used for his rectum was expletively defamatory). But in truth, I never actually said those words, rather that it is possible that pink elephants could or might be emitted out of the lamentable guy's fecal orifice. So there was a total disconnect as to what he said I said, with what I actually said. To follow up, I would gather that the elephants would have to be compressed and then expand upon emission, else the pain would probably be completely unbearable, with a quick and merciful death promptly petitioned for.

Perhaps if he ever met me again, he would blurt out: "You are so ruefully closed-minded." And my response might be: "If I was so closed-minded, I would not even be talking to you."

Speaking of pain, I assume (and not presume) that the reason an atheist or agnostic or some similarly disbelieving loonytoon does not presume that red and green stoplights are a deceptive illusion, is their fear of intense pain they could quite possibly inflict themselves with by being broadsided on the driver's side by some innocent victim violently but innocently connecting with them at some intersection, possibly with the police viewing the entire collision incident and ready to administer copious and irrevocable blame for (or "against" - depending upon your point of view) the disbelieving atheist or agnostic clearly at fault in that situation.

Ephesians 5:14 Therefore it is said, "Awake, Oh sleeper, and rise up from the dead, and Christ shall give you light."

In conclusion, it is sensible and admirable to assume that some answer presently available pertaining to origins (i.e. The Bible) is the ONLY viable answer (so far) instead of presuming either that there is: (1) no answer, or (2) that the Bible answers are wrong, a lie, invalid, deceptive, and erroneous (without having any reasonable grounds whatsoever for disregarding, castigating, and/or debasing them).

It is disgraceful to dislike the profession of having "faith" -- not false "faith" in the heretical and apostate myth of evolution, but rather in the marvelously-informative contents of The Bible.

Though scoffers will not admit it, they exercise non-catatonic faith in the perfectly-predictable phenomena (of the Creator who they rebelliously shun and blaspheme) as (for instance) they non-catatonically trust (yes: trust) that the floor on which they are now standing or sitting will not suddenly collapse under them, and the roof won't non-expectantly cave in on top of them, and that God's meteor from outer space will refrain from coming down and crashing on their thick skulls and air-brained contents therein without being formally invited whether by so-called "spam" public-service-announcement e-mails from devout and concerned Christian missionaries or The Spirit directly, morse-code telegraphs from whoever, or whatever.

They non-admittedly (and, again: non-catatonically, without being self-immobilized with terror-griped paralysis) trust a non-sadistic God's constant correctly-proportioned atmosphere so that they are not excruciatingly suffocating, gravity so they are not flung upward off the Earth and consequently consigned to writhing in anguish with the air-pressure-missing torture of suddenly boiling blood.

They trust friction on the roads they drive, gasoline to stay liquid until vaporized, rubber in tires to not quickly disintegrate, and God's Sun to not explode all of a sudden and incinerate them, yet they hypocritically brag that they neither believe in the Creator who sustains their very lives in remarkable pleasantness while He understandably and occasionally punishes them and Job-like collateral damage for and in their wayward asinine ignorance, with His hurricanes, earthquakes, tornadoes, poisonous gases and spiders and snakes and irritating mosquitoes which they should have - by now - learned to predict and control or avoid instead of fooling around bothering and harassing His saints who take pleasure in admitting that they at least trust and love Him and His.

It is common sense to go with something (such as the Bible's answers to origins) that is -- instead of bellering out goofy presuppositions and ridiculous theories that are not . . . which Scripture-concordant philosophy is very valuable in assuming that a drifting life raft still near enough for someone to jump into off the melting iceberg is "the thing to do" rather than refusing to admit the existence of the life raft or criticizing and condemning it for not being a preferred color, size, material, origin of manufactured production or brand, country of origin, known identity of purchase provider, or nitpickiness-calculated placement in the water.

Why don't articles in The New York Times and The Washington Post and The Boston Globe state EXACTLY the precise same words about the very same news item, and so why do scoffers criticize somewhat-different highlights written within the four gospels of the New Testament? And keep in mind that four thousand men could be part of five thousand men, and the Lord can use The Devil to do the Lord's will without the Lord being reprimandable -- even though the Lord "gets the credit" who ultimately controls it all.

The atheist and agnostic evolutionist must ["must?"] read precisely and only what the given words of The Bible really are -- rather than prejudicially and pompously defame what they mistakenly presume misrepresentatives have said it to have said ... gullibly depending upon pseudo-know-it-alls with or without academic credentials and post-graduate degrees in pseudo-"scholarly" brainwashed superstition and laughably-fraudulent "education" -- and then carefully scrutinize and analyze if it adequately-enough correctly relates to genuine and authentic reality and the bonafide reality of natural phenomena around us and what we are somewhat certain has happened in the past.

The only alternative concerning them is for them to pathetically and despicably wallow and flounder in the misty-fog abyss of depraved egocentric uncertainty and doubt accentuated into mean-spirited tirades of ranting blatter - causing misery both on themselves and against others.

Second Thessalonians 3:2 ...and that we may be delivered [away] from wicked and evil humans; for not all have faith.

As to timing the supposedly-old age of some large trees on Earth, it behooves honest and accurate scientists to use mechanisms to correctly determine starting points of time, and open-mindededly investigate known-and-not-known alteration factors in time durations all along the way from the first incidence or appearance of possibly-already-adult-from-the-beginning trees, to the present.

It is not legitimate for evolution espousers like Bill Nye to - without acceptable cause and without adequate proofs - disregard the Biblical answers as to origins of environmental phenomena on Earth. Indeed, Ken Ham could press Nye and similar disbelievers who reject the Scriptural answers to origins as to WHY he and they do so, and thus if one definition of absurd and despicable "fool" is to reject - for no scientific reason(s) and substantiation - the Scriptural accounts of creation in the Old Testament book of Genesis.

Moreover, not only "fool" would be an appropriate term for the aforementioned who reject what is obvious and right in front of them, declared by clearly sane and intelligent, genuine and scholarly, scientists, but - consequently also, the term: "stupid" would be applicable. Pathetic it is for those atheists and naysayers who have the innate intelligence to think otherwise do not -- but because of their insidious rebellion against subjection to the God and Christ of Scripture, they make themselves asinine idiots, imbeciles, or at least morons . . . and dangerous-against-society ones at that - as they "glory in their [evolutionist-superstition] shame."

The claimed eagerness of Nye to "find out the answers" belies and contradicts his hypocritical negation against that very endeavor. Nye, in fact, does NOT WANT to find out origins answers, because if he did, he would at least give verifiable and testable proofs as to why THE ONE answer given in the Bible pertaining to creation must be misconstrued a diabolically-deliberate and outright-lying fable, legend, tale, metaphorical allegory, or deceitful myth, concocted by non-inspired devious Bible authors who blasphemously misrepresented both the Creator and the phenomena He created -- all to hatefully and prejudicially defame the heretic fabrication of evolutionary theory which allegedly existed from the beginning (but actually did NOT so exist).

Explore the Nye-vs-Ham Evolutionist-vs-Creationist Debate Analysis at:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SWl9qB8a0u4

Extraterrestrial Aliens?

Earth Age?

Gender Origin?

Genesis Chapter 1?

Geocentricity?

How Old is the Earth?

Intelligent Design 1?

Intelligent Design 2?

Missing Links?

Privileged Planet?

Starters?

Stable Decay Rates?

Global Warming?

Jesus Christ, Creator of the Universe and all therein, is THE Basis of all spatial and durational dimension measurement(s) and thus both spoken and written cognitive descriptions relating to such.

When He, of Himself in the Biblical New-Testament book of Revelation, stated that He "is the Alpha and the Omega, the Beginning and the Ending," He thus rightly and legitimately declared Himself the Originator of all describable physical dimensions of time and space and all alpha-numeric human elaborations pertaining to all known entities in existence.

For example, the Scriptural Old-Testament Genesis word for "day" (i.e. yom in Hebrew) records the God-incepted initiation and continuance of an absolute time-duration delineator. Yom never was, is not, and never will be dependent upon the axial rotation period of any planet nor of any solar object such as our Sun in any solar system.

Moreover, it is God (i.e. Jesus within the Holy-Trinity Godhead) who first spoke to the first created male human Adam, and installed fully-operational mechanisms within Adam enabling Adam to both understand finite-limitations language and to construct, formulate, and utter such finite-parameters alpha-numeric communication himself.

Humans have the questionably-beneficial capacity to conceive of what does not and cannot exist, although that ability is obviously dependent on what they have already been endowed with from the Creator. They also have the laudable capacity to conceive of what does exist but cannot be completely comprehended and understood.

To conceive of what does not and cannot exist involves an illogical mis-alteration or misappropriation of what does exist. For example, to wrongly state that the Sun is made of green cheese has the components of the Sun (which does exist) and green cheese (which also does exist) - but combining them into an obviously faulty proposition is clearly absurd. Similarly, to state that "God" had no beginning and will have no ending is possible semantically for a human to utter, but to understand what cannot be measured as to no starting and no finishing is not only impossible but irritating if there is persistent-enough attempt to comprehend such an incomprehensible fact.

The question of which came first: the chicken, or the egg? - is logically an easy one to answer, being that the egg is a entity of reproduction and not production. When weighing the importance of whether philosophy of religion or religion of philosophy is more important, it should be clear that religion is of supreme importance over not only philosophy but all forms of changeable-theories science:

Joh 8:23 He said to them, "You are from below, I am from above; you are of this world, I am not of this world.
1Co 2:15 The spiritual man judges all things, but is himself to be judged by no one.
1Ti 6:20 Oh Timothy, guard what has been entrusted to you. Avoid the godless chatter and contradictions of what is falsely called "science."

Pertaining to contemplating the actual source of all origins in the scientific search for all possible and reasonably-credible references to such Source, the genuine, authentic, non-bigoted and non-biased, open-minded, credentialed or non-credentialed scientist eventually discovers what is contained in the contents of The HOLY BIBLE pertaining to the source of entity origins:

Psalm 10:4 In the pride of his countenance the wicked does not seek Him; all his thoughts are, "There is no God."
Psalm 14:1 To the choirmaster. Of David. The fool says in his heart, "There is no God." They are corrupt, they do abominable deeds, there is none who does good.
Psalm 53:1 To the choirmaster: according to Mahalath. A Maskil of David. The fool says in his heart, "There is no God." They are corrupt, doing abominable iniquity; there is none who does good.

Why does David call atheists, agnostics, and Darwinian evolutionists: "fools?"

First of all, he calls them fools because the entity of someone they purport to not believe in (i.e. God) is [religiously!] being suggested by themselves to exist!

Ecclesiastes 10:3 Even when the [evolutionist] fool walks on the road, he lacks sense, and he says to every one that he is a [does-not-know-the-answers-for-certain] fool.

As Jesus put it:

Matthew 27:11 Now Jesus stood before the governor; and the governor asked him, "Are you the King of the Jews?" Jesus said, "You have said so."
Mark 15:2 And Pilate asked him, "Are you the King of the Jews?" And he answered him, "You have said so."

[ And by answering such, like Jesus did with regard to His bypassing-the-accusation-of-treason-against-Caesar as to whether to pay taxes to Caesar and rendering to God what belongs to God and to Caesar what belongs to Caesar, Jesus again avoided any suspicion of attempting any terroristic anti-Roman-Government coup or hostile takeover. Not only that, Jesus was able to simultaneously proselytize Pilate and to convict Pilate himself in the sense of a sort of Pilate's confessional implied acknowledgement of the Divine-monarchy-status of the obviously-supernaturally-empowered Miracle Worker Pilate was talking to with the already-well-known-and-documented reputation of Jesus which Pilate already knew regarding Jesus ].

Second He calls them fools because of the logical necessity of intelligently-designed entities by default having been brought into existence by an Intelligent Designer, and obviously-created phenomena of necessity having been brought into existence by - logically - a Creator (Duh!) :

Genesis 1:1 In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.
Genesis 6:7 So the LORD said, "I will blot out man whom I have created from the face of the ground, man and beast and creeping things and birds of the air, for I am sorry that I have made them."
Exodus 20:11 for in six days the LORD made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that is in them, and rested the seventh day; therefore the LORD blessed the sabbath day and hallowed it.
Exodus 31:17 It is a sign for ever between me and the people of Israel that in six days the LORD made heaven and earth, and on the seventh day He rested, and was refreshed.'"
Deuteronomy 4:32 For ask now of the days that are past, which were before you, since the day that God created man upon the earth, and ask from one end of heaven to the other, whether such a great thing as this has ever happened or was ever heard of.
Isaiah 42:5 Thus says God, the LORD, who created the heavens and stretched them out, who spread forth the earth and what comes from it, who gives breath to the people upon it and spirit to those who walk in it . . .
Isaiah 45:12 "I made the earth, and created man upon it; it was my hands that stretched out the heavens, and I commanded all their host."
Isaiah 45:18 For thus says the LORD, who created the heavens (He is God!), who formed the earth and made it (he established it; He did not create it a chaos, He formed it to be inhabited!): "I am the LORD, and there is no other."

Romans 1:20 Ever since the creation of the world His invisible nature, namely, His eternal power and deity, has been clearly perceived in the things that have been made. So they are without excuse;
Colossians 1:16 for in Him all things were created, in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or principalities or authorities -- all things were created through Him and for Him.
Hebrews 1:2 but in these last days He has spoken to us by His Son, whom He appointed the heir of all things, through whom also He created the world.
Hebrews 11:3 By faith we understand that the world was created by the word of God, so that what is seen was made out of things which do not appear.
Revelation 4:11 "Worthy are You, our Lord and God, to receive glory and honor and power, for You did create all things, and by Your will they existed and were created."

When atheists or Darwinian evolutionists are asked about what lifeforms evolved from, their preliminary answer might be: Mother Earth. But if they are pressed to suggest where "Mother Earth" came from, they might continue on to purport that Earth was a molten-lava spinoff from the Sun, which itself was one of countless fragments spreading out from some alleged "Big Bang" explosion from some supposedly "central" location in the universe. As to a query of where the Big-Bang molten-lava-spinoff material came from, their answers frequently consist of either one of two not merely illogical but impossible explanations:

1. What exists has always existed, or
2. We do not know (and do not really care to find out).

Why Explanation #1 is aberrant is that it presumes (not "assumes") that what exists is itself the no-beginning source of what exists, and thus is preposterous and blasphemous idolatry, making out the created as also the Creator, contrary to:

Romans 9:20 But who are you, a man, to answer back to God? Will what is molded say to its molder, "Why have you made me thus?"
Romans 1:25 because they exchanged the truth about God for a lie and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed for ever! Amen.

First Timothy 1:4 [ Instruct them to not ] occupy themselves with myths and endless genealogies which promote speculations rather than the divine training that is in faith

Why Explanation #2 is faulty is because there is a scientifically-congruent SourceBook clearly stating the Source of [not ridiculously-concocted "Big-Bang" whatever which is a mindless buzzword-phrase one could expect out of an immature and childish two-year-old....but instead:] the heavens and earth and all therein:

Colossians 1:15 [The Son of God, Jesus Christ] is the image of the invisible God, the first-born of all creation
16 for in Him all things were created, in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or principalities or authorities -- all things were created through Him and for Him.
17 He is before all things, and in Him all things hold together.

Second Peter 3:5 They deliberately ignore this fact, that by the word of God heavens existed long ago, and an earth formed out of water and by means of water,
6 through which the world that then existed was deluged with water and perished.
7 But by the same word the heavens and earth that now exist have been stored up for fire, being kept until the day of judgment and destruction of godless men.

Hebrews 1:1 In many and various ways God spoke of old to our fathers by the prophets;
2 but in these last days He has spoken to us by a Son, whom he appointed the heir of all things, through whom also He created the world.
3 He reflects the glory of God and bears the very stamp of His nature, upholding the universe by His word of power. When He had made purification for sins, He sat down at the right hand of the Majesty on high,
8 But of the Son He says, "Your throne, God, is forever, the righteous scepter is the scepter of Your kingdom.
9 You have loved righteousness and hated lawlessness; therefore God, Your God, has anointed You with the oil of gladness beyond Your comrades."
10 And, "You, Lord, did found the earth in the beginning, and the heavens are the work of Your hands;
11 they will perish, but You remain.

The word "evolution" implies two incorrect deviations:

(1) that animate (and by evolutive association: inanimate) entities exceeded their reproductive or source-based parameters and characteristics, which falsity violates:

Job 11:12 But a stupid man will get understanding, when a wild ass's colt is born a man.

(2) that animate (and by evolutive association: inanimate) entities became animated (or inanimated) and into existence by themselves....contrary to:

Isaiah 45:9 "Woe to him who strives with his Maker, an earthen vessel with the potter! Does the clay say to him who fashions it, 'What are you making'? or 'Your work has no handles'?
Isaiah 45:10 Woe to him who says to a father, 'What are you begetting?' or to a woman, 'With what are you in travail?'"

In verifiable historical and scientific reality, it should be clear to you the reader that neither 1) nor 2) have ever occurred, are now occurring, nor probably ever will occur......even once!

TO ANY DEGREE NOR IN ANY WAY - whether in large, miniscule, gradual, or sudden form and appearance.

To use contemporary conventional terms, there has never been, is not now, nor ever will be ANY macro-evolution NOR "micro-evolution."

It is at this point that this webpage author must express profound disappointment and embarrassment against some creationist advocates, especially those who refer to Holy Writ in their defense of creationism along with their attack against evolutionism.

Why such partially-faithless and somewhat-cowardly creationists have equated variation and adaptation within different created kinds with "micro-evolution" (by definition being "incremental minute evolution on an infinitesimal scale") is lamentably pitiful and pathetic.

Perhaps they presume that partly patronizing the virulent public-school-authority and Herodian-like legal-nitpicker proponents of evolutionism will get their creationism foot in the door wherever and whenever. All instead that happens is a putrid pollution of mixing heretical "micro-evolution" mythology with some creationist orthodoxy, like combining a little piss with pop and a little poop with pudding, neither of which is fit for anyone to ingest!

As a result, confusion is caused, and NO one is happy.

Hence, such is the wrong word to use pertaining to within-kinds variations (resulting from new random combinations of genes occurring in lifeform-reproduction offspring but within species limitations and parameters!), along with within-KINDS adaptations occurring in lifeform-reproduction offspring (resulting from new and reproduced characteristics caused by differing environmental factors but within species limitations and parameters!).

There is a type of "survival of the fittest" in operation in which some succeed and some fail, although:

Ecclesiaster 9:11 Again I saw that under the sun the race is not to the swift, nor the battle to the strong, nor bread to the wise, nor riches to the intelligent, nor favor to the men of skill; but time and chance happen to them all.

Quite honestly and frankly, handicapped people are in fact ugly - in proportion to the type and severity of their disability. They are also inconvenient.

Such is so, whether they were crippled with their handicap from birth, deliberately or accidentally caused themselves to get handicapped, or were accidentally or deliberately handicapped by someone else or others. [ And in the cases where victims were deliberately handicapped by some assaulter or group of assaulters, the perpetrators should be impaired themselves as they have impaired the victims, in accord with "An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth" ].

"Survival of the fittest?"

One's Biblical response to a handicapped person is to apportion them activities and interaction with others in accord with the capacities they do have which are useful to themselves and others:

Leviticus 21:16 And the LORD said to Moses,
17 "Say to Aaron, None of your descendants throughout their generations who has a blemish may approach to offer the bread of his God.
18 For no one who has a blemish shall draw near, a man blind or lame, or one who has a mutilated face or a limb too long,
19 or a man who has an injured foot or an injured hand,
20 or a hunchback, or a dwarf, or a man with a defect in his sight or an itching disease or scabs or crushed testicles;
21 no man of the descendants of Aaron the priest who has a blemish shall come near to offer the LORD's offerings by fire; since he has a blemish, he shall not come near to offer the bread of his God.
22 He may eat the bread of his God, both of the most holy and of the holy things,
23 but he shall not come near the veil or approach the altar, because he has a blemish, that he may not profane my sanctuaries; for I am the LORD who sanctify them."
24 So Moses spoke to Aaron and to his sons and to all the people of Israel.

What is a Scriptural response to those who are temporarily or permanently handicapped and disabled? Should one's natural dislike and abhorrence against them be expressed in a Darwinian or Hitlerian eugenics genocide against such? Consider the actions of Christ Jesus pertaining to the crippled and handicapped in the New Testament:

Matthew 4:24 So His fame spread throughout all Syria, and they brought Him all the sick, those afflicted with various diseases and pains, demoniacs, epileptics, and paralytics, and He healed them.
11:5 the blind receive their sight and the lame walk, lepers are cleansed and the deaf hear, and the dead are raised up, and the poor have good news preached to them.
12:22 Then a blind and dumb demoniac was brought to Him, and He healed him, so that the dumb man spoke and saw.
15:30 And great crowds came to Him, bringing with them the lame, the maimed, the blind, the dumb, and many others, and they put them at His feet, and He healed them,
15:31 so that the throng wondered, when they saw the dumb speaking, the maimed whole, the lame walking, and the blind seeing; and they glorified the God of Israel.

Mark 1:34 And He healed many who were sick with various diseases, and cast out many demons; and He would not allow the demons to speak, because they knew Him.
Mark 3:10 for He had healed many, so that all who had diseases pressed upon Him to touch Him.

Luke 4:40 Now when the sun was setting, all those who had any that were sick with various diseases brought them to Him; and He laid His hands on every one of them and healed them.
5:15 But so much the more the report went abroad regarding Him; and great crowds gathered to hear and to be healed of their infirmities.
6:17 And He came down with them and stood on a level place, with a great number of His disciples and a great crowd of people from all Judea and Jerusalem and the seacoast of Tyre and Sidon, who came to hear Him and to be healed of their diseases;
7:21 In that hour He cured many of diseases and plagues and evil spirits, and on many that were blind He imparted sight.
9:1 And He called the twelve together and gave them power and authority over all demons and to cure diseases,

Acts 19:12 so that handkerchiefs or aprons were carried away from his body to the sick, and diseases left them and the evil spirits came out of them.
Acts 28:9 And when this had taken place, the rest of the people on the island who had diseases also came and were cured.

YOUNG Creation!

Hotlinks to Earlier-Authored Webposts:

Alien Beings
Biolorigins
Crience
Gendorigin
Intelligent Design
Microevolunacy
Privileged Planet?
Scientific Origins
17 Feb 07
STABLE Radioactive Decay Rates
The Assortment

Starship Trip

"Do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewal of your mind....":

that you might prove what is the good and acceptable will of God in Christ Jesus.

Moses Given Finger-of-God/Fire-Etched 10 Commandments on Mount Sinai

Young Creation

Evolutionists vs Creationists (38-minute video)

Math TV (including Calculus)

The Co-ed Look

Hebrew-Greek-English Interlinear Bible Segments

Hebrew-Greek-English Interlinear Bible Segments

Strong Dictionary Definitions of Anti-Immodesty Bible Verses

John Wesley New-Testament Passages

Geocities

CDCV Hotlinks

Other Bible-translations-related webpages are hotlinked below:

Evil New American Standard Bible N.T.
Wicked New International Version N.T.
Interlinear Hebrew-Greek-English Scripture Segments
Interlinear Hebrew-Greek-English Scripture Segments
Strong's Definitions of Selected N.T. Greek Words
Excerpts from the John Wesley N.T. Translation
Sacred-Harp Choral Singing
Assortment of Hymnal Selection Scores, Russian Orthodox, and Sacred Harp Singing Hotlinks
Excerpts from the New Life Version Bible Translation
LCA Red Hymnal Liturgy Scores
Favorite Baptist Hymns Scores
Augustana Black Hymnal Liturgy Scores and Hymns
Social-Issues Webpage Hotlinks
General Topics and Pics Webpage Hotlinks

TOPIC = REAL-Science Errors in the Senselessly-Alarmist Hollywood movie: "The Day After Tomorrow"

The interesting special effects of sudden -150 freezing in Britain bringing down military helicopters, sudden devastating tornadoes destroying most of Los Angeles, a sudden rising ocean wave from some massive Atlantic-Ocean storm deluging the streets of NYC, and even the sudden cracking along one of the Antarctic ice shelves were impressive and non-forgettable, but (alas!) were quite-misleading fantasy fiction, because:

(1) Human fossil-fuel-combustion only VERY-slightly contributed to global warming within the past 100 years (even during pre-EPA Clean-Air-Act period at the beginning of the smoggy Industrial Revolution) and is virtually insignificant compared to the global warming from increased solar and volcanic causes

(2) A few degrees difference (let's say from -40 to -38) over a substantially-lengthy time period would NOT unfreeze ANY of the ice shelves nor parts thereof at EITHER the North or the South Pole of planet Earth

(3) The fresh-water input of VERY-gradual slightly-melting ice caps at the North pole of Earth would have virtually no effect of significantly changing overall ocean temperatures on planet Earth, because (for one thing) the slightly-melting ice-caps water at the South pole of Earth would counterbalance the same happening at the North pole

(4) The well-known, relatively-predictable, and reasonably-expected intensity of the Sun's heat during summer in North America (relating to one of two hemispheres on Earth) would obviously prevent half of North America from permanently becoming and being covered with ice and cold temps.

Genesis 8:22 "While the earth remains, seed-time and harvest, cold and heat, summer and winter, day and night, shall not cease." [ - The Holy Spirit of God through His inspired-human-author Moses speaking ]

Psalm 74:17 You have fixed all the bounds of the earth; you have made summer and winter. [ - The Holy Spirit of God through His inspired-human-author David speaking ]

Waywardly-rebellious anti-Biblical gullible, stuporfied pawns of pseudo-"scientific" gurus and Global Warming dictators craving population control and management, might blatter:

"Maybe it COULD be or become like we saw in the Hollywood-special-effects movie: The Day After Tomorrow." To which myopic, one-sided-for-evolution-possibility-only, mindless prejudicial bigots both the Bible and preachers proclaiming the contents therein would comment:

First Timothy 1:3 As I urged you when I was going to Macedonia, remain at Ephesus that you may charge certain persons not to teach any different doctrine,
First Timothy 1:4 nor to occupy themselves with myths and endless genealogies which promote speculations rather than the divine training that is in faith . . .

First Timothy 4:7 Have nothing to do with godless and silly myths. Train yourself in godliness . . .

Second Timothy 4:3 For the time is coming when people will not endure sound teaching, but having itching ears they will accumulate for themselves teachers to suit their own likings,
Second Timothy 4:4 and will turn away from listening to the truth and wander into myths.

Titus 1:13 This testimony is true. Therefore rebuke them sharply, that they may be sound in the faith,
Titus 1:14 instead of giving heed to Jewish myths or to commands of men who reject the truth.

Second Peter 1:16 For we did not follow cleverly devised myths when we made known to you the power and coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, but we were eyewitnesses of his majesty.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

DEFILEMENT-BY-PORNO-MOPHEADED-POLLUTION ANTIDOTE = As the English word: "Joshua" is spelled differently that the English word: "Jesus,"
they ALSO do NOT mean the same.

According to Matthew 1:23, the word "Jesus" (correctly defined by God's authoritative heavenly angel) means:

'He shall save His people against their sins' -

which obviously is NOT equivalent nor characteristic of ANY referenced "Joshua" meaning anywhere in Holy Writ.

Even in Hebrew, there is BOTH a SPELLING AND a MEANING differentiation
between the transliterated 'Jehoshua' and the transliterated 'Joshua.'

Please thoroughly explore the intricacies of the contents of . . .

http://sightwar.tripod.com/biblical_modesty_texts